๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ F๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด G๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ C๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฑ. ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฝ P๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿญ R๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€.

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฑ. ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฝ ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿญ ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€.

Capital didn't disappear, it got selective. And that changes everything.

In the current market, "interesting" doesn't get funded. "Investable" does.

Whatโ€™s the difference?

Interesting = Compelling technology, smart team, big TAM, polished deck

Investable = All of that plus defensible unit economics, a documented path to profitability and a realistic capital deployment plan

If you're in AI infrastructure, vertical SaaS or picks-and-shovels categories, you still need to prove traction and demonstrate operational discipline.

If you're outside those hot zones, you need to prove something even harder: why you're the exception worth backing when capital is concentrated.

Today's investors aren't asking "what could this become?" They're asking "what have you proven, and what exactly will my capital accelerate?"

The companies crossing this threshold do three things differently:

-> They build traction and measure investor-grade KPIs before they raise
-> They translate innovation into repeatable customer economics
-> They demonstrate capital efficiency that de-risks the investment thesis

Your breakthrough deserves better than hope and a deck.

The question isn't whether you can prove your product is a breakthrough. It's whether you can prove you're ready for what comes after the term sheet is signed.

Previous
Previous

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—™๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด